• Attorneys
    • Ira J. Kurzban
    • Jed Kurzban
    • Helena Tetzeli
    • John Patrick Pratt
    • Edward Ramos
    • Lauren Olivia Gallagher
    • Kevin A. Gregg
    • Dominique Pando Bucci
    • David Calles Smith
    • Ryan Patterson
    • Elizabeth Montano
    • Martha Rodriguez
  • Practice Areas
    • Immigration
    • Serious Personal Injury
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Kidney Disease
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Business Corporate Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Resources
    • In The News
    • Articles
    • Newsletters & Press Releases
    • Seminars
    • Immigration Review Podcast
    • Immigration Review Case Summaries
    • Immigration Review Blog
  • Results
    • Immigration Results
    • Kidney Disease Results
    • Medical Malpractice Results
    • Personal Injury Results
    • Civil Litigation Results
    • Appellate Decisions
  • Blog
  • Contact

Consult With An Attorney Today:
786-401-4706

En Español

Call : 786-401-4706

  • Attorneys
    • Ira J. Kurzban
    • Jed Kurzban
    • Helena Tetzeli
    • John Patrick Pratt
    • Edward Ramos
    • Lauren Olivia Gallagher
    • Kevin A. Gregg
    • Dominique Pando Bucci
    • David Calles Smith
    • Ryan Patterson
    • Elizabeth Montano
    • Martha Rodriguez
  • Practice Areas
    • Immigration
    • Serious Personal Injury
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Kidney Disease
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Business Corporate Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Resources
    • In The News
    • Articles
    • Newsletters & Press Releases
    • Seminars
    • Immigration Review Podcast
    • Immigration Review Case Summaries
    • Immigration Review Blog
  • Results
    • Immigration Results
    • Kidney Disease Results
    • Medical Malpractice Results
    • Personal Injury Results
    • Civil Litigation Results
    • Appellate Decisions
  • Blog
  • Contact

Supreme Court rules against immigrants seeking deportation leniency

On behalf of Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A. | May 21, 2012 | Deportation and Removal

The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that an undocumented immigrant brought to the United States by his or her parents as a child cannot avoid deportation based upon the parent’s immigration status and years of legal residency under an immigration law provision that allows leniency for eligible immigrants.

Generally, immigration law provides an exception to removal after a criminal conviction for immigrants who have been in the country for at least seven continuous years and have been legally registered for at least five years. Immigration law gives the government discretion in such cases, and immigrants can seek leniency in removal proceedings if they qualify under the exception.

The Board of Immigration Appeals essentially has held that that cancellation of removal provision at issue cannot be satisfied by the residency or LPR status of the immigrant’s parents. A split in the federal circuits arose, and the Supreme Court heard two cases from the Ninth Circuit earlier this year. The cases essentially held that the government could consider the parents’ history under the contested immigration law provision.

One of the immigrants obtained lawful permanent residency in 2003, when he was 19 years old. Roughly two years later, law enforcement arrested the immigrant on suspicion of immigrant smuggling. The federal government ultimately began removal proceedings, seeking to deport the man based upon the criminal case. The man’s father had been admitted as a legal permanent resident in 1991.

The man argued that his father’s immigration status and years of legal residency could be considered in determining whether the exception should apply. Ultimately, the Ninth Circuit held that the man could rely upon his father’s residency.

The second case involved a Jamaican citizen who was admitted as a permanent resident in 1995. The young man was admitted as an LPR when he was 15 years old, according to the high court ruling. His mother had been lawfully in the country for six years when the young man was admitted.

In 2002, he was convicted for a controlled substance offense, and the federal government began removal proceedings. He argued that the time he lived as a minor with his mother should be considered, allowing him to fall within the eligibility exception to remain in the country.

The Obama Administration argued in the Supreme Court that the plain language of the immigration laws require that an immigrant personally satisfy the eligibility requirements to avoid deportation after a criminal conviction. The government claimed that any preference for family unity must yield to the plain language of the law. The administration argued that its high-priority efforts to deport criminals would be harmed if the immigrant could rely upon the residency requirements of a parent in these types of cases.

The Supreme Court held in favor of the government. The justices ruled that the Board of Immigration Appeals interpretation of the law requiring an immigrant to personally satisfy the residency or LPR requirements to be eligible for a cancellation of removal is consistent with the text of the statute and entitled to deference.

Source: Reuters via Chicago Tribune, “Supreme court rules for government on immigrants’ residence,” James Vicini, May 21, 2012

Categories

  • Accidents
  • Birth Injuries
  • Brain Injuries
  • Car Accidents
  • child citizenship
  • citizenship
  • Cruise Ship Injuries
  • Deportation and Removal
  • Employment Immigration
  • Failure to Diagnose
  • Family Immigration
  • Family Visas
  • Fiancée Visas
  • Firm News
  • Hospital Negligence
  • Immigration
  • Immigration Review
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Personal Injury
  • premises liability
  • Products Liability
  • Truck Accidents
  • Uncategorized
  • US Immigration Law
  • US Permanent Residency
  • Wrongful Death

Recent Posts

  • Federal judge gives reprieve to H-1B visas, overturns Trump rules
  • Unjust Florida law allows legal recoveries for some, but not for all
  • What are signs of acute renal failure?
  • Dealing with the aftermath of a car accident
  • Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals rules that noncitizens in immigration court are bound by the statements of their attorneys

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Medical Malpractice

Serious Personal Injury

Immigration

Kidney Disease

Motor Vehicle Accidents

Business/ Corporate Law

Complex Civil Litigation

Contact An Attorney

Let us know how we can help you.

Miami Office

131 Madeira Ave.
Coral Gables, FL 33134

Phone: 786-401-4706
Fax: 305-444-3503

Map & Directions

Honolulu Office

1003 Bishop Street
Suite 1600
Honolulu, HI 96813

Phone: 786-401-4706
Honolulu Office

Map & Directions

© 2021 Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us